Introduction and Research Status of 6-Dimensional Health State Classification System / 中国卫生经济

Cost-utility analysis(CUA) was widely used for health care decision-maker.It systematically introduced ShortForm 6D(SF-6D) and described the latest international research and application progress.Compared with EuroQol 5 Dimensions Questionnaire(EQ-5D),SF-6D had higher time validity and more reliable result on estimating patients in some fields.On the other hand,the unity value of SF-6D was estimated based the investigation result of Short Form-36(SF-36) through transferring literature and reports.Based on the method,estimating the health unity of patients' health could make the maximized use of the current data of SF-36,so as to save the costs of pharmacoeconomic.However,further research needs to verify that this transformation model is suitable for Chinese.

The Bibliometric Analysis on the Application Status of EQ-5D and SF-6D in Cost-Utility Analysis in the Recent 10 Years:Based on PubMed Data Base / 中国卫生经济

Objective: To analyze the application status of the EQ-5D and SF-6D in cost-utility analysis ( CUA) . Methods: The data from PubMed data base from 2003-2012 was conducted as the main resource in econometric analysis. Results: There is no certain increasing trend of literature quantity in the recent 10 years’ application of EQ-5D and SF-6D in the CUA. The main published language was English and the main country was the United Kingdom. The core authors of researches on the CUA estimated by EQ-5D and SF-6D had not been formed, however, the core periodicals had been formed. The literatures involve wide-spread diseases, mainly known as Motion system and pain diseases. Most of the effectiveness could be calculated with quality adjusted life year ( QALY) , the object of CUA is mainly on the medicine, operation and health intervention. Conclusion: Appicating EQ-5D and SF-6D in CUA and research content of the literatures has wide distribution width, although it has shown centralized trend, which still needs more studies by related researchers.

Health domains and race in generic preference-based health-related quality of life instruments in the United States literature / Domínios de saúde e raça nas medidas genéricas de qualidade de vida associada à saúde na literatura dos Estados Unidos / Dominios de salud y raza en las medidas genéricas de calidad de vida, asociada a la salud, en la literatura de los Estados Unidos

Race differences in health have been extensively analyzed and documented in the literature, especially between African Americans or blacks and whites in the United States. Despite the vast literature in the area, the majority of studies that explore the relationship between race and health use outcomes such as self-rated health, mortality or morbidity, and disability, but very few use Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measures and their domains or dimensions. This narrative review aims to provide a better understanding of the relationship between race and health domains that are commonly used in preference-based HRQoL measures. We investigated the literature on race, physical health, mental health, pain and discomfort, cognition, neurologic spectrum domains, dexterity, ambulation, vitality and social functioning domains. We conducted a literature search and review using the key words race and the health domain of interest, using medical and social sciences databases, such as MEDLINE/Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Google Scholar portal.The majority of the studies identified in the literature show that African Americans or blacks in the United States tend to have lower scores than whites throughout a variety of health domains found in preference-based HRQoL measures. This review also emphasizes the scarcity of studies that investigate some health domains, such as social functioning, dexterity, vitality and neurologic spectrum domains, and therefore we identify the need for more studies focusing on race and measures that address such domains.

A literatura sobre raça nos Estados Unidos está repleta de estudos que documentam diferenças na saúde entre negros e brancos. Entretanto, a maioria dos trabalhos que exploram a relação entre raça e saúde utiliza medidas com saúde autorrelatada, mortalidade e morbidade, mas poucos empregam medidas de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde e seus domínios específicos. Este artigo revisa a literatura sobre raça e qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde, especificamente examinando os domínios que constituem as principais medidas baseadas na teoria da utilidade: saúde física; saúde mental; dor e desconforto; cognição; domínios neurológicos; destreza; locomoção; vitalidade; e funcionamento social. Conduziu-se uma revisão da literatura usando as palavras-chave raça e o domínio da qualidade de vida de interesse nos Estados Unidos. Foram consultadas as bases de dados Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science e o portal Google Scholar. A maioria dos estudos sobre diversos domínios das medidas de qualidade de vida investigados sugere que negros têm pior qualidade de vida do que brancos nos Estados Unidos. A revisão salienta a escassez de estudos que exploram a relação entre raça e alguns domínios, como, por exemplo, funcionamento social, destreza, vitalidade e domínios de escopo neurológico, e, portanto, mostra a necessidade de que futuros estudos examinem a relação entre raça e estes domínios.

La literatura sobre raza en los Estados Unidos está repleta de estudios que documentan diferencias en la salud entre negros y blancos. No obstante, la mayoría de los trabajos que explotan la relación entre raza y salud utiliza medidas con salud autorrelatada, mortalidad y morbilidad, pero pocos emplean medidas de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y sus dominios específicos. Este artículo revisa la literatura sobre raza y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, específicamente, examinando los dominios que constituyen las principales medidas basadas en la teoría de la utilidad: salud física; salud mental; dolor y molestias; cognición; dominios neurológicos; agilidad; locomoción; vitalidad; y funcionamiento social. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura usando las palabras-clave raza y el dominio de la calidad de vida de interés en los Estados Unidos. Se consultaron las bases de datos Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science y el portal Google Scholar. La mayoría de los estudios sobre diversos dominios de las medidas de calidad de vida investigados sugiere que los negros tienen peor calidad de vida que los blancos en los Estados Unidos. La revisión resalta la escasez de estudios que explotan la relación entre raza y algunos dominios, como, por ejemplo, funcionamiento social, agilidad, vitalidad y dominios de objetivo neurológico, y, por tanto, muestra la necesidad de que futuros estudios examinen la relación entre raza y estos dominios.